← All Work·Aviation·1 week·Feb 2026

Flying Club Invoice Automation

Replaced manual paper slip entry with AI-powered extraction — from 10 minutes per slip to 10 seconds.

Document AIMobile AppWorkflow Automation

Key Results

Time per Slip
10 sec
Accuracy
95%
Monthly Hours Saved
8+
Setup Cost
$0*

The Problem

A small flying club treasurer was spending hours each month manually transcribing paper flight slips into Quicken for invoicing. Each slip contained handwritten pilot names, Hobbs meter readings, destinations, and charges — and every slip meant:

  • Squinting at handwriting
  • Calculating flight time (Hobbs out → Hobbs in)
  • Multiplying by hourly rate
  • Manually typing into accounting software

With 30-50 flights per month, this meant 5-10 hours of tedious data entry — time the volunteer treasurer didn't have.

Pain points

  • Handwritten data — Varied penmanship, sometimes illegible
  • Manual calculations — Easy to make arithmetic errors
  • No digital trail — Paper slips get lost, damaged, or misfiled
  • Context switching — Jumping between paper, calculator, and software

The Intervention

We built a mobile-first app that lets the treasurer snap a photo of a flight slip and get structured data back instantly.

How it works

  1. Snap or upload — Take a photo or drag-and-drop on desktop
  2. AI extraction — Vision model reads all fields (pilot, aircraft, times, route)
  3. Review & edit — Verify extracted data, fix any errors
  4. Export to Quicken — One-click CSV export in the exact format Quicken expects

Key insight: Train the model where to look

During testing, we discovered the AI was grabbing the wrong "name" — it found a signature field instead of the pilot name field. This highlighted the importance of:

  • Field-specific prompts — Tell the model exactly what to look for and where
  • Negative examples — "Don't extract from the signature line"
  • Validation rules — Pilot name should match known member list

Architecture

Photo → Vision AI → Structured JSON → Review UI → Quicken CSV
          ↓              ↓
    GPT-4o/Gemini   Field validation

Stack

  • App: React Native + Expo (web, iOS, Android)
  • AI: GPT-4o Vision, Gemini 2.0 as fallback
  • Backend: Supabase Edge Functions
  • Export: Quicken-compatible CSV format

The Outcome

Before → After:

  • Time per slip: 10 minutes → 10 seconds
  • Monthly time: 5-10 hours → 15-30 minutes
  • Error rate: ~5% (calculation mistakes) → under 1%
  • Data retention: Paper in a box → Searchable digital history

Unexpected benefits

  • Historical analysis — "Who flew the most this year?"
  • Faster reconciliation — Match slips to payments instantly
  • Member self-service — Pilots could eventually log their own flights

Key Learnings

  1. Start with the export format — We built backward from Quicken's CSV spec, ensuring perfect compatibility
  2. Handwriting varies wildly — Multi-model approach (try GPT-4o, fall back to Gemini) handles edge cases
  3. Human review is a feature — 95% accuracy + quick human verification beats 99% accuracy that takes 10x longer
  4. Small clubs have big problems — Volunteer-run organizations desperately need automation

Screenshots

Flight Log Home Screen
Home screen with scan, entry, and export options
Flight Log Review Form
Review form with extracted flight data

*Ongoing cost is approximately $0.02-0.05 per slip for AI API calls.

Engagement type: Agent Prototype → Production app
Timeline: 1 week from concept to working app
Demo: flight-log-psi.vercel.app

Tech Stack

React NativeExpoGPT-4oGeminiSupabaseTypeScript
GTA Labs — AI consulting that ships.